Earlier this week Vice President elect Joseph Biden was briefed on the just released study by the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism that a WMD attack was likely sooner than later and that the supposed “margin of safety” was narrowing.
Related Articles
- Tony Blair: I didn’t see Iraq nightmare coming (guardian.co.uk)
- Report finds DOJ not fully prepared for WMD attack (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Gains in Bioscience Cause Fears (online.wsj.com)
I think it’s “Inevitable”.
Why is it a news agency here in the U.S reported last week that the “inevitable” use of a WMD by terroists was blown out of proportion. and the use of a WMD is very low and likely NOT to happen. So which is it- likely or not likely? From both reports I have read they both contradict each other. This post says it is likely and the U.S.govt report last week stated not likely because of better security and intelligience. So who should we listen to? Our govt whom may be hiding a known fact from us citizens, or our new vice/president whom campaigned to be “honest in telling the facts/truth.” Biden has already warned of problems ahead. In my opinion, I think I’d rather listen 2 new administration, BUT I HAVE 100% CONFIDENCE OBAMA & BIDEN ARE GOING TO DO WHATEVER 2 PROTECT US, God Bless us all for safeness/protection from the demons whom seek 2 destroy.
So…duck and cover?